My friend (and I sincerely mean that) over at The Landscapist has been keeping me mildly entertained the last couple of days. First, he offered up a quote from Ralph Waldo Emerson that I guess is an explanation of sorts for the rather edgy photograph that goes with it. If you know Mark, you know that he’s just being himself and advertising his particular brand of photography. Can’t fault him for that. It’s just the way he views the world. For Mark, “ugly” is simply part of a well – balanced visual diet.
Soon after that, he posted some more images from his visit to Taughannock. In this post, he says:
Once I had achieved my Saturday, November 14th objective of picturing Taughannock Falls, I began picturing what really piqued my picturing interest at this location – the narrow strip of land between the trail to the falls with the river/stream that flowed from the falls to the lake and the opposite gorge/chasm wall as a backdrop.
I found it interesting that, while people were picturing up a storm at the falls, nary a camera was in sight or in use along the 3/4 mile trail to and from the falls.
I have to say that I found this highly amusing. He’s saying – once again – that while the “pretty picture crowd” was busily snapping away up by those iconic waterfalls, he was looking for the “real” stuff, the stuff that everybody else ignores. Those places where “reality” hides.
Wrong. Each time I’ve visited Taughannock, I’ve walked down the path to the falls. And each and every time there were people making photographs in that area between the path and the stream that Mark is talking about. In fact, if you wanted to find someone with a “serious” camera and tripod, that would be the place to look. They might also go to the base of the falls, but most of the people at that location are toting point – and – shoots or just cellphone cameras. These folks are taking pictures to show that they were there. That’s all. They could care less about reality or art. Now, maybe these were the only people around when Mark visited. I don’t know. But believe me, Mark isn’t the only one who thinks that there is potentially good subject matter away from the main attraction.
Today’s image was taken in the same general area. I always explore this area, as well as the paths above the main falls. You can spend a lot of time here. But to be perfectly honest, I’m not real crazy about any of the images I’ve gotten in this particular spot. Why? Because to me they tend to lack energy. They’re not bad, I guess; they’re just kind of static. I could have come back an hour later and taken pretty much the same picture. To be sure, it will look different this winter and much different next spring, but for a fall day, this is pretty typical. It’s a mediocre photograph. And so is Mark’s.
So is it ”art”? For me, no. And the one above is my own. I am extremely reluctant to label any of my own work “art” (that’s for someone else to judge), but I have no problem saying that an image of mine doesn’t qualify. If there is no energy, then it’s just a two dimensional representation of what was in front of me.
And what, exactly, do I mean by “energy”? Now that’s a good question.
The quote at the top, by the way, is from Harry S. Truman. I have no idea what he was referring to…….









